Application security / report template
Web Application Pentest Report Template & OWASP 2025 PDF Example
Connect application findings to their OWASP Top 10:2025 categories and show what the engagement actually assessed. The template separates technical observations, possible impact and the evidence required for closure.
Versioned OWASP coverage with evidence and limits.
The coverage section lists all ten OWASP Top 10:2025 categories, including Software Supply Chain Failures and Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions. Each row has an editable assessment status and an evidence or limitation field.
Use coverage statuses to distinguish assessed controls, partial evidence and unassessed areas. Link findings to the relevant OWASP categories without treating an empty finding count as proof of coverage.
The PDF is exported from a populated demonstration report saved in Vulnotes. It includes technical findings, remediation ownership and planned acceptance checks without claiming live exploitation.
Web Application Assessment: scope, evidence and references
The guidance below describes how to scope and document the work. It does not imply that every topic is covered by the sample PDF. Record the reference editions used in your own engagement.
Choose the right role for each OWASP reference
The web application Top 10:2025 is an awareness taxonomy. ASVS 5.0.0 supplies verification requirements, while WSTG provides testing guidance; WSTG lists 4.2 as its released version and 5.0 as development work. Record exact editions and requirement identifiers in the engagement, since numbering changes across releases.
Use the Top 10 to organize findings, not to define completeness. A category can contain several unrelated controls. Record what was assessed, the evidence source and any limitations separately from the number of findings. A category with zero findings is not automatically a pass.
Describe the application and authorization model
Specify application release, environments, roles, tenant contexts, external identity providers and business workflows. State the availability of source code, design documentation and test data. Distinguish runtime observations from implementation review and record features excluded from the assessment.
For findings, keep the affected component, expected security property, observation and impact separate. An authorization issue needs role and object ownership context. A rendering issue needs the data path and output context. A supply-chain observation needs the dependency or build evidence actually reviewed, not just a category label.
Use scoring and retest evidence consistently
When reporting CVSS scores, preserve the version and vector with each numeric score; CVSS is a severity measure rather than a complete business-risk decision. Do not relabel an existing vector as v4.0. Use a separate explanation for release priority, exposure and business dependencies.
The category pages repeat findings from the report. Configure the finding model with the fields expected by the template, including owasp values such as A01:2025. When adapting categories or editions, review filters and the final export so that a missing or mismatched value does not silently omit a finding.
Inside this example report
The 29-page PDF shows how the report is organized. Its example content illustrates the layout; adapt it to the scope and evidence of your own engagement.
- 01
Scope and conclusions
Identify the application release, evidence sources, tenant contexts and assessment boundaries.
- 02
OWASP Top 10:2025 coverage
One table lists A01-A10 with explicit status, finding references and evidence limitations.
- 03
Technical finding details by category
A category-sorted summary precedes A01-A10 introductions with attributed official excerpts and description summaries. Each category is followed by its own findings, with CVSS, description, impact and remediation sections. Document-control tables record report ownership and distribution.
- 04
Remediation and closure
Keep planned dates, correction ownership and required acceptance evidence separate from completed retest results.
Make the report useful to its readers
Pin the framework version
Retain the 2025 identifiers and category names. Review mappings explicitly when changing editions.
Document the evidence boundary
Explain the scope behind each coverage status. Record unassessed categories and avoid unsupported pass or compliance claims.
Keep report and slides consistent
Use the same finding references, OWASP categories and remediation owners across both deliverables.
Make it your own in Vulnotes
- 1
Download your template from Vulnotes Manager
Sign in to Vulnotes Manager, download this template and add it to your instance. Select it when creating a report to reuse its layout, report variables and finding sections. The public PDF shows an example of the finished output.
- 2
Let Vulnotes fill the connected variables
The template includes variables connected to your report: client details, engagement dates, findings and severity statistics where used. Vulnotes fills these from the data saved in your report. Add your findings and complete assessment-specific sections such as scope, analysis and conclusions; automatic population does not replace that work. Match the finding fields and categories expected by the template.
- 3
Edit the structure and visual design
Change page layout, orientation, margins, fonts, colors, branding, headers and footers in the template editor. Edit or replace tables, chart settings, images, code blocks and section labels. Heading numbering and the table of contents can be adapted to your delivery conventions. Text embedded inside an image must be changed in the source image or replaced.
- 4
Adapt the data bindings
Report variables hold engagement-specific content. Finding loops and filters control repeatable sections; charts and score tables can use report data. Review these bindings when renaming fields or changing the finding structure. Individually authored slide summaries still need editorial updates when findings change.
- 5
Write, review and deliver
Create your report with its client, scope and dates. Replace the example content, add your findings, review the preview and export the finished document.
Common questions
Which OWASP version does this template use?
OWASP Top 10:2025. This is the web application Top 10, distinct from the API Security Top 10 and MASVS.
Does using this template establish complete OWASP coverage?
No. Coverage depends on the work performed and evidence recorded for your engagement. OWASP Top 10 is an awareness taxonomy, not a complete verification checklist or certification.
Can I reuse the example as an audit result?
No. Complete the template using your actual scope, findings, evidence and review decisions before client delivery.
What does the template download contain?
The download contains a reusable English Vulnotes document template with editable OWASP coverage fields. Configure your finding model for reference, title, description, impact, remediation, exploitation, references and owasp. Set owasp to the exact category identifier, such as A01:2025 or A05:2025, to include the finding in its category section.
What export formats are available in Vulnotes?
Vulnotes exports reports as PDF, editable Word documents (DOCX), Excel spreadsheets (XLSX), structured report data (JSON), and ZIP archives containing the report PDF and attachments, with optional password protection. XLSX lets you select finding fields and report content sections. You can also export selected findings as a partial PDF or DOCX report. The client portal additionally offers CSV exports of findings when enabled by the administrator. Read the export documentation.